Take My Cookies, Give Me My Google Search

Google privacy 300x45 Take My Cookies, Give Me My Google SearchGoogle has announced that effec­tive 1 March 2012 it will con­sol­i­date all 60 of its pri­vacy poli­cies into one and will share infor­ma­tion across all of its ser­vices. This has many of the pri­vacy para­noid in a tizzy. Among the more amus­ing con­cerns expressed are:

  • “I don’t want my bak­ery shop owner to know what kind of med­i­cines I buy from the nearby med­ical store”
  • “Pri­vate email mes­sages might con­tain any num­ber of per­sonal, embar­rass­ing, or oth­er­wise dam­ag­ing infor­ma­tion, and Google’s attempts to amplify and con­tex­tu­al­ize this infor­ma­tion through tar­geted ads, Maps sug­ges­tions, or Cal­en­dar reminders could have neg­a­tive con­se­quences for users.” — Sen. Richard Blu­men­thal (D-Conn.)
  • “Google will know more about you than your wife does”

Google privacy all 300x167 Take My Cookies, Give Me My Google SearchYou get the point, the typ­i­cal reac­tions. The truth is, the infor­ma­tion that is shared from the dif­fer­ent Google sources is just as pro­tected as it always has been. What is changed is that all of the Google ser­vices now share infor­ma­tion among each other.

If your e-mails include such pri­vate infor­ma­tion that you are seri­ously wor­ried about inter­cep­tion, you should be using some form of encryp­tion. If you are wor­ried about what is divulged on your social media page then you are just plain delu­sional, it is divulged and you should not be post­ing dummy. If you truly believe that your brows­ing his­tory is com­pletely pri­vate now you are most likely mis­taken. If you are that con­cerned about pri­vacy you should prob­a­bly stay off of the Internet.

I for one wel­come Google con­tin­u­ing to improve its busi­ness model. I greatly enjoy hav­ing such a great search engine avail­able for free. Any­thing that can be done to improve my abil­ity to find even more infor­ma­tion so quickly is fine with me. When I think back to the time when it took days, even weeks, in the uni­ver­sity library to find just one piece of infor­ma­tion that I can now find in min­utes I am con­tin­u­ally amazed.

Is Still Here

BTW, the impor­tant part of Google’s new pri­vacy state­ment is what infor­ma­tion they share. It reads as fol­lows:

Infor­ma­tion we share

We do not share per­sonal infor­ma­tion with com­pa­nies, orga­ni­za­tions and indi­vid­u­als out­side of Google unless one of the fol­low­ing cir­cum­stances apply:

  • With your consent

We will share per­sonal infor­ma­tion with com­pa­nies, orga­ni­za­tions or indi­vid­u­als out­side of Google when we have your con­sent to do so. We require opt-in con­sent for the shar­ing of any sen­si­tive per­sonal information.

  • With domain administrators

If your Google Account is man­aged for you by a domain admin­is­tra­tor (for exam­ple, for Google Apps users) then your domain admin­is­tra­tor and resellers who pro­vide user sup­port to your orga­ni­za­tion will have access to your Google Account infor­ma­tion (includ­ing your email and other data). Your domain admin­is­tra­tor may be able to:

      • view sta­tis­tics regard­ing your account, like sta­tis­tics regard­ing appli­ca­tions you install.
      • change your account password.
      • sus­pend or ter­mi­nate your account access.
      • access or retain infor­ma­tion stored as part of your account.
      • receive your account infor­ma­tion in order to sat­isfy applic­a­ble law, reg­u­la­tion, legal process or enforce­able gov­ern­men­tal request.
      • restrict your abil­ity to delete or edit infor­ma­tion or pri­vacy settings.

Please refer to your domain administrator’s pri­vacy pol­icy for more information.

  • For exter­nal processing

We pro­vide per­sonal infor­ma­tion to our affil­i­ates or other trusted busi­nesses or per­sons to process it for us, based on our instruc­tions and in com­pli­ance with our Pri­vacy Pol­icy and any other appro­pri­ate con­fi­den­tial­ity and secu­rity measures.

  • For legal reasons

We will share per­sonal infor­ma­tion with com­pa­nies, orga­ni­za­tions or indi­vid­u­als out­side of Google if we have a good-faith belief that access, use, preser­va­tion or dis­clo­sure of the infor­ma­tion is rea­son­ably nec­es­sary to:

      • meet any applic­a­ble law, reg­u­la­tion, legal process or enforce­able gov­ern­men­tal request.
      • enforce applic­a­ble Terms of Ser­vice, includ­ing inves­ti­ga­tion of poten­tial violations.
      • detect, pre­vent, or oth­er­wise address fraud, secu­rity or tech­ni­cal issues.
      • pro­tect against harm to the rights, prop­erty or safety of Google, our users or the pub­lic as required or per­mit­ted by law.

We may share aggre­gated, non-personally iden­ti­fi­able infor­ma­tion pub­licly and with our part­ners – like pub­lish­ers, adver­tis­ers or con­nected sites. For exam­ple, we may share infor­ma­tion pub­licly to show trends about the gen­eral use of our services.

If Google is involved in a merger, acqui­si­tion or asset sale, we will con­tinue to ensure the con­fi­den­tial­ity of any per­sonal infor­ma­tion and give affected users notice before per­sonal infor­ma­tion is trans­ferred or becomes sub­ject to a dif­fer­ent pri­vacy policy.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , |

Please leave a comment

It’s Not Very Much (Relatively)

pile of money 5 e1327540826490 It’s Not Very Much (Relatively)Hey, he is actu­ally right. When you think about it, $375,000 is not really very much money. Well not really very much com­pared to $21,000,000. But for cry­ing out loud, just how out of touch with nor­mal peo­ple is some­one who would say “For the past 10 years, my income comes over­whelm­ingly from invest­ments made in the past, rather than ordi­nary income or earned annual income. I got a lit­tle bit of income from my book, but I gave that all away. Then, I get speak­ers fees from time to time, but not very much.” Well, not very much is rel­a­tive. Accord­ing to his per­sonal finan­cial dis­clo­sure, from Feb­ru­ary 2010 to Feb­ru­ary 2011, Mitt Rom­ney earned almost $375,000 in speak­ing fees.

But then this pales com­pared to Mitt Romney’s total income

The tax returns, which Rom­ney had stead­fastly refused to release until now, show he earned $45m over the past two years, and paid just $6.2m in taxes, a rate of about 15%. Most of the income was derived from invest­ments from his $200m-plus fortune.

In 2010, Rom­ney earned more than $21m and paid $3m in tax, a rate of less than 14%. He expects to pay $3.2m in taxes on his 2011 income, a rate of 15.4%.”

So the speaker’s fees made up less than 2% of Mitt Romney’s income. For the aver­age U.S. fam­ily income of about $60,000, 2% would be only $1,200. I hate to tell Mitt Rom­ney, but if he walked up to an aver­age Amer­i­can fam­ily and handed them $1,200 in cash they would not say “it is not very much”. So maybe what I said back in the open­ing is a bit of an exag­ger­a­tion. But then if you make $21,000,000 a year, $375,000 is prob­a­bly pocket change. I really have trou­ble imag­in­ing how it feels.

Mitt Rom­ney has proven he is out of touch with the finan­cial con­di­tions of real Amer­i­cans with his words. What about other lead­ing can­di­dates for the Office of Pres­i­dent of the United States?

Newt Gin­grich revealed at the week­end that he paid nearly $1m in income tax, a rate of about 31%.

The Oba­mas had a joint income of $1.7m in 2010, much of it from sales of the president’s two pop­u­lar books. They paid 26% in tax.”

They seem down­right poor com­pared to Mitt Rom­ney. But I think most of us would accept their income very will­ingly. I will make no other com­ments on the stand­ing of the two can­di­dates, or any of the oth­ers. On this par­tic­u­lar topic none have been quite as bla­tantly out of touch as Mitt Romney.

But we need to accept the fact that we shall prob­a­bly never see a per­son rise from a back­ground as hum­ble as Abra­ham Lin­coln reach the Oval Office again. Time and pol­i­tics have changed to the point where only those who have a cer­tain level of per­sonal wealth can play the game.

Is Still Here

Posted in Society | Tagged , , , , , , , |

Please leave a comment

It Is Simple Courtesy and There Is Too Little Left

starbucks e1325813590480 It Is Simple Courtesy and There Is Too Little LeftExit­ing one of the local houses of the inter­na­tion­ally known, caffeine-providing mer­maid with one hand full of a morning’s serv­ing of well-steamed milk and extract of slightly over roasted cof­fee beans; I tried to hold the door open for a young lady who appeared to be enter­ing for her own fix of caf­feine. The young lady stopped when I stopped to hold the door open for her, smiled, and said, “Why, you are so kind.” She actu­ally seemed some­what sur­prised that I would hold the door for her. I hon­estly found this both sur­pris­ing and mildly dis­turb­ing. You see, I grew up dur­ing a time when young men were taught to hold the door for ladies when they were enter­ing a build­ing. It was sim­ply some­thing you do. When my brain is not dis­en­gaged the habit con­tin­ues to this day (even though I am cer­tainly no longer young). But not just for ladies, but for any­one who is enter­ing when I am at the door. It is just in my per­son­al­ity (when my brain is engaged). I was mildly dis­turbed only because I did not think it was right that she should seem at all sur­prised that some­one should hold the door for her.

But before the young lady could enter, some­thing that rep­re­sents a very com­mon occur­rence hap­pened. Also rush­ing in to get his morn­ing caf­feine fix was a thirty-something human that I can only call a Rufus, a big lum­ber­ing, mind­less dog of a per­son; one that hap­pened to be dressed in a busi­ness suit and tie who had just exited from his styl­ish new BWM and felt no com­punc­tion against push­ing past the young lady into the mermaid’s house. The young lady had to step back to avoid being bumped by Rufus. All I could say was, “Per­haps he will spill his cof­fee all over his nice leather seats.” She laughed and gave me a sly smile.

It only takes about 5 sec­onds to hold the door for the other per­son and it does make their day a lit­tle nicer. I can only think of one or two things that are so urgent that you can­not spare the 5 sec­onds. Give it a try.

Is Still Here

Posted in Society | Tagged , , , , |

Please leave a comment

No Related posts

A Real Southern Winter Holiday Dinner

Dinner e1324865141718 A Real Southern Winter Holiday DinnerAn unmis­tak­able smell of anise, cin­na­mon, cloves, and gin­ger lingers very dis­tinctly this morn­ing. If it was not for the fact that I knew what I had cooked, I could eas­ily have believed my mater­nal grand­mother had been cook­ing her hol­i­day treats. But no this was from last night’s Win­ter Hol­i­day din­ner shared by Still Here Too and me.

We had two won­der­ful vis­its with the Munchkins and the Grand Munchkin; one at their home a cou­ple of weeks ago and again, just a week ago, here at our home. We had been able to visit with Still Here Too’s fam­ily in the last few weeks. We were able to visit with good friends on the Win­ter Hol­i­day Eve. So our Win­ter Hol­i­day was a quiet day to enjoy the pres­ence of just the two of us. And that we did. A day of phys­i­cal plea­sures to con­tinue the bond of our long-term rela­tion­ship. A day of men­tal plea­sures to enjoy the quiet read­ing good books (I am finally, finally read­ing Neil Gaiman’s “Amer­i­can Gods” I have no idea why it has taken me so long, I have meant to read it for years, but finally am and enjoy­ing it immensely). A day of culi­nary plea­sures to share the won­der­ful fla­vors of anise, cin­na­mon, cloves, and ginger.

Being in the South­ern US, we would really be break­ing tra­di­tion if we made like Ralphie’s fam­ily and headed for a Chi­nese restau­rant for our Win­ter Hol­i­day din­ner. But there is noth­ing wrong with Crispy Duck for your Win­ter Hol­i­day meal, espe­cially when paired with a bot­tle of Mon­taudon Classe M!

Tra­di­tional? Prob­a­bly not to most of our neigh­bors. But it is a tra­di­tion for us, at least for this year; and it is a great one at that. And even bet­ter, work is allow­ing us to con­tinue it for all of this week icon biggrin A Real Southern Winter Holiday Dinner .

There is only one prob­lem. It hardly seems like Win­ter Hol­i­day out­side. 80⁰F (27⁰C) is too damn warm to call Win­ter. Weather Man says a cold front is com­ing in two days. Will have highs all the way down to 70⁰F (21⁰C). Still too damn warm.

 Happy Box­ing Day.

 Is Still Here

P.S. If by some chance you are won­der what hap­pened to the Vegan exper­i­ment, I found it a bit too hard to work around avail­able foods dur­ing work and start­ing allow­ing too many carbs into my diet (not good for my A1C read­ings). But hon­estly, we both have a lit­tle bit too much Hedo­nist in us to give up all the culi­nary plea­sures avail­able in our remain­ing time. Not that we will com­pletely over indulge, but sur­vival in not to be unenjoyed.

Posted in Our Path | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , |

Please leave a comment

39 Years

We for­mally joined, at least as rec­og­nized by the state, 39 years ago today at 5:30 in the after­noon on a very cold winter’s day 5 hours west of the Prime Merid­ian. It all really started six months before that. And we are still here.

inlet1 39 YearsToday is not a cold day. In fact, today is mild and clear so we are headed out to the same old (very old by the stan­dards of the New World) town where we went after joined so long ago. We will be tak­ing the back­roads in our lit­tle zoom-zoom with the top down most of the way. There is a won­der­ful Tapas place in the old town where we will eat. How­ever, being the older folk we have now become, we will return well before the night gets old.

See ya.

Is Still Here & Still Here Too

Posted in Our Path | Tagged , , , , , , |

Please leave a comment

Where Did the Posts Go?

garbage dump 2 Where Did the Posts Go?There has been quite a spell since the last post. What has hap­pened? Where did the posts go? Well, some got started, some were almost fin­ished; all of them were “down­ers”. I have no idea why they are all “down­ers”. I am not really in a dark mood; at least I don’t think I am. Maybe it is all the Repub­li­can Debates. Maybe it is the Econ­omy. Maybe it is Green Men from Mars.

I haven’t a clue. But I sure as hell am not going to bur­den any of you with the crap I was start­ing to post, it has been sent to the garbage dump where it belongs.

Is Still Here

Posted in Random Thoughts | Tagged , , |

Please leave a comment

Struggles of an ENTJ Father Confessor

3876 p1 confessional jpg3 177x300 Struggles of an ENTJ Father ConfessorMy work­place has been a bit tense of late; the dys­func­tional econ­omy, our own dys­func­tion, our customer’s dys­func­tion – a bit of a mess. Need­less to say, there are many opin­ions of what is wrong and what should be done to fix what is wrong. Also need­less to say, these many opin­ions are rarely in agree­ment with the other opin­ions. As in so very often true in cases like this, the peo­ple with the dis­agree­ing opin­ions do not seem to be able to talk to each other about their opin­ions. Oh no, they sit around in small groups and gripe and moan and get all spun up. And when they do decide to talk about the issues (which are per­haps real, just not nec­es­sar­ily exactly as they per­ceive) who is it that they seek out to dis­cuss (vent) their thoughts too? You got it, me.

If you have fol­lowed our blog much, you know that I test as an ENTJ per­son­al­ity type in the Myers-Briggs Type Indi­ca­tor (MBTI) assess­ment. My nat­ural incli­na­tion when pre­sented with a stream of peo­ple com­ing to my office to talk about a sit­u­a­tion and offer­ing their view of the prob­lem and the solu­tion would be to lis­ten but quickly try to guide them to my view of issue. After all, if I have been involved, I have already formed some opin­ion of the solu­tion. Unless the per­son pro­vides me with new infor­ma­tion that changes my opin­ion of the solu­tion, I will by my very nature be in “lead” mode not “fol­low” mode (but I will always be look­ing for new evi­dence – the para­noia gene is strong – never miss a chance to catch your own mistakes!)

But this is dif­fer­ent. This prob­lem goes beyond the spe­cific issue. This is a peo­ple issue. In my younger days I would not have under­stood this very well. I have matured men­tally at least some as my body has matured quite a bit. But even with this higher level of men­tal matu­rity it has taken a lot of restraint to allow each of the peo­ple who has come to me to vent their ver­sion of the sit­u­a­tion and to place blame as they see it, even though in sev­eral cases they placed blame squarely on the per­son who was last in to see me. Oh how tempt­ing it was to take con­trol of the con­ver­sa­tion and just start explain­ing my view. It sure would have been a lot quicker. But instead I engaged in a very long inter­change of ques­tions that tried to lead them to see other aspects.

In the end, I believe I have two “con­verts”. Two peo­ple who have come to under­stand my point of view. What is encour­ag­ing is that these two peo­ple are two of the more senior among those who have come to see me and, prob­a­bly most impor­tant, they are openly dis­cussing their new-found point of view.

Con­vert­ing the pop­u­la­tion is such a slow process. I am essen­tially an impa­tient per­son once I know what direc­tion needs to be fol­lowed. This has been very drain­ing. The issues from work make no sense with­out pro­vid­ing so much back­ground that I would pre­fer just not talk­ing about them. Still Here Too, my dear INFP life part­ner, really would like to share much more of what hap­pens at work. Just bring­ing it up makes me feel so drained.

I have always had many inter­ests out­side of work, most of which I share with Still Here Too, that are very far removed from my career. This is prob­a­bly a pri­mary rea­son why Still Here Too and I have been able to have the rela­tion­ship we have when so many other cou­ples in intense pro­fes­sional sit­u­a­tions drift apart. Main­tain­ing those inter­ests has often meant that I need to try to not make work issues a pri­mary topic of con­ver­sa­tion when I am in my “Still Here Too” world.

But ten­sion and stress from work are hard to keep out of my “Still Here Too” world. The mis­take I gen­er­ally make, and I have made this time, is not rec­og­niz­ing that I am stressed and talk­ing about the stress and pres­sure. I know why I avoid bring­ing the sub­ject up. Still Here Too will want to under­stand the sit­u­a­tion and share and will ask what has hap­pened. The mis­take is not hers for ask­ing. The mis­take is mine for not learn­ing to explain in quick terms so I do not increase my stress. She has the right to know. She should under­stand why I am stressed.

Maybe some­day I will learn … perhaps.

Is Still Here

Posted in Scientist-Manager | Tagged , , , , , , , , , |

3 Comments

What If a Relationship Should Not Last?

separation 225x300 What If a Relationship Should Not Last?The other day, we posted a dis­cus­sion on so many cou­ples enter­ing into a rela­tion­ship in ways that almost guar­an­tees fail­ure as the out­come. If you have read our blog at all you know that we are in a long-term, monog­a­mous rela­tion­ship and truly believe that such a rela­tion­ship has many advantages.

In fact, to some, we might even seem some­what “preachy” and evan­gel­i­cal on the topic. We really are not try­ing to preach or pros­e­ly­tize; we just feel very strongly about a sit­u­a­tion that is right for us. Nor are we naïve about our rela­tion­ship. We are in many ways a very odd cou­ple; the rela­tion­ship “experts” would never match an ENTJ and an INFJ INFP (“Doh!”, must learn to proof­read some­day) and it would be a total lie to say our intrin­sic per­son­al­i­ties do not cre­ate con­flict, but match we are. Even if the odds of eHar­mony or Match.com of pick­ing us as a good pair­ing are very much less than likely.

In the recent post we said:

If you don’t join together, why bother with a long-term rela­tion­ship? If you are going to cre­ate escape tun­nels, you are not really plan­ning to stay in the rela­tion­ship. Don’t bother enter­ing into it in the first place. You will save both you and you part­ner a lot of pain.

Together is bet­ter in our opinion.”

We believed that when we wrote it and we believe that now. But per­haps we need to add that our com­ments were mostly refer­ring to when orig­i­nally com­mit­ting to a relationship.

What about when a per­son is in a rela­tion­ship, is fully com­mit­ted to the rela­tion­ship, and their part­ner drifts from the com­mit­ment? Or even when the bond between the two peo­ple fades and both feel a loss of the com­mit­ment? When the rela­tion­ship is over there is no rea­son to live with the pain just because a com­mit­ment was made. The only rea­son to main­tain the rela­tion­ship is for the sake of the rela­tion­ship. If it is bro­ken, truly bro­ken, it should be allowed to die. And it can be like death, but there is noth­ing to be gained to waste life liv­ing as if dead.

One of the most joy­ous occa­sions we have ever attended was W7, the wed­ding of two dear friends. It was wed­ding num­ber four for one and num­ber three for the other. But this time they got it right. There were good things that came from W1 through W6, as was rep­re­sented by the off­spring there to sup­port the occa­sion. But never has there been a bet­ter exam­ple of a rela­tion­ship that is going to last than the one between the pair joined at W7.

BTW, W7 was attended by a mix of long stand­ing friend/couples in var­i­ous stages of rela­tion­ships, includ­ing us. Some worked, in strange ways, some didn’t. The way of life.

When a rela­tion­ship should not last, it needs to die. It needs to die so that a new one can be born to have a chance to become one that can and should last.

Is Still Here & Still Here Too

Posted in Partnership | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , |

2 Comments