Solicitor General of the United States Elena Kagan, who should be newsworthy only because she is currently nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court, has been deemed newsworthy by The Wall Street Journal for playing softball in 1993 (Thanks to my friend The Curator for originally pointing this out to me). This has caused a massive stir among some portions of the media, primarily about Elena Kagan’s sexual orientation. For reasons that I do not understand, having played softball in 1993 indicates to some that she is gay. If this were not such a serious issue, I could find some amusement in all of the posturing. I never realized softball is indicator of sexual orientation! Truly surprising given the number of local Christian-church sponsored schools currently playing in high school softball playoff games in spite of the sponsoring Church’s strong opposition to gay and lesbian lifestyles.
I am also very disturbed that the same groups that seem to be making an issue of this “non-issue” are the very ones that, when it suits them, turn to a very strict reading of the U.S. Constitution. But they do not seem to want to do that in this case. What the U.S. Constitution says about the Supreme Court, which is the only part of our judicial system specifically called out in the Constitution, is as follows.
U.S. Constitution
Article III
Section 1.The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office.
Section 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;–to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public ministers and Consuls;–to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;–to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;–to Controversies between two or more States;–between a State and Citizens of another State;–between Citizens of different States;–between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.
In all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a State shall be Party, the supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction. In all the other Cases before mentioned, the supreme Court shall have appellate Jurisdiction, both as to Law and Fact, with such Exceptions, and under such Regulations as the Congress shall make.
The Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have directed.
Section 3.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
I find no mention of softball or sexual orientation. So if the Second Amendment means the guy down the street can have a semiautomatic strapped to his belt because it does not explicitly preclude it when it allows “arms”, then a U.S. Supreme Court Justice is allowed to have played softball in college.
I sure wish our political system allowed honest debate instead of this insane posturing!
Is Still Here








The double standard when it comes to sexual orientation never ceases to astound me! For some reason, it is deemed “pertinent” to determine the sexual orientation of a Supreme Court nominee. Does that mean that the sitting Justices must declare themselves as to who they sleep with? Hardly. It is time to stop demonizing anyone for their potential or actual sexual orientation and begin to address the REAL issues that are tearing this country apart. (What’s even more flabbergasting in this case, if possible, is that Solicitor General Kagan is NOT GAY — but she did have a heck of a softball swing, 17 years ago!!)
Over and above the specific issue, the big concern is how all political debate and news reporting has been turned into sound bites and posturing. It has become nearly impossible to have a serious discussion on the issues of any topic, in this country or any other. We need debate, thought and consideration not opinion polls.
What must our children think of us?
Is Still Here