Guilt by Association

lost charlotte e1274101260619 Guilt by AssociationCon­fes­sion; from time to time while dri­ving to work, espe­cially if NPR is run­ning a story I am not par­tic­u­larly inter­ested in or is in the mid­dle of one of their “beg fests”, I will switch the radio to one of the some­what crude, but enter­tain­ing, talk shows on the rock chan­nels. For­give me.

This morn­ing was one of the times I made such a switch. Too embar­rass­ing to tell you which show I was lis­ten­ing to, but the topic that caught my atten­tion was a dis­cus­sion of the report that British actress Char­lotte Lewis says film­maker Roman Polan­ski raped her in 1982 in Paris when she was 16. What struck me was a com­ment by one of the hosts of the talk show. He said Ms. Lewis would have no cred­i­bil­ity sim­ply because she had appeared in Play­boy. At least the co-host asked why this mattered.

Why the hell do so many peo­ple think that if a beau­ti­ful woman chooses to model, whether for a mag­a­zine or as a sub­ject for an artist or in a movie or for that mat­ter in a live per­for­mance, it makes her tes­ti­mony ques­tion­able? For that mat­ter, what does a woman, or any person’s, lifestyle, directly have to do with their cred­i­bil­ity. I can under­stand ques­tion­ing someone’s cred­i­bil­ity if they have a his­tory of speak­ing falsely. But to ques­tion their cred­i­bil­ity just because they live a life dif­fer­ent from some norm; pre­judg­ment based solely upon unjus­ti­fied bias.

Is Still Here

This entry was posted in Society and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Guilt by Association

  1. The Curator says:

    A per­fect exam­ple of “blam­ing the vic­tim,” and gen­er­ally those vic­tims are women. For some rea­son, a woman’s sex­ual his­tory has been fair game for defense attor­neys to use in court against them! For­tu­nately, there are now laws in place to pre­vent just that, unless the defense can prove that it’s hon­estly and truly rel­e­vant to the case.

    I think it’s impor­tant to address this issue, and want to thank you for the great post. (BTW, if it was Howard Stern, for shame! :-) )

  2. Stiletto says:

    Peo­ple are ass­holes and sim­plis­tic in their think­ing. They think one auto­mat­i­cally equals the other even though they have no legit basis to draw from. You tell enough peo­ple one thing and soon they start to believe it. Not unlike mass hysteria.

  3. Mass hys­te­ria; that does seem like what so much “pub­lic opin­ion” runs on these days.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>