During my lunch break, I was listening to NPR (I had to make up for listening to the less-than socially acceptable talk show while driving in to work this morning) and heard a story that raised questions about the safety of the new whole-body scanners being implemented in airports.
According the NPR:
David Agard, a biochemist and biophysicist at the University of California, San Francisco. “But there really is no threshold of low dose being OK. Any dose of X-rays produces some potential risk.”
Agard and several of his UCSF colleagues recently wrote a letter to John Holdren the president’s science adviser, asking for a more thorough look at the risks of exposing all those airline passengers to X-rays. The other signers are John Sedat, a molecular biologist and the group’s leader; Marc Shuman, a cancer specialist; and Robert Stroud, a biochemist and biophysicist.
“Ionizing radiation such as the X-rays used in these scanners have the potential to induce chromosome damage, and that can lead to cancer,” Agard says.
The San Francisco group thinks both the machine’s manufacturer, Rapiscan, and government officials have miscalculated the dose that the X-ray scanners deliver to the skin — where nearly all the radiation is concentrated.
The stated dose — about .02 microsieverts, a medical unit of radiation — is averaged over the whole body, members of the UCSF group said in interviews. But they maintain that if the dose is calculated as what gets deposited in the skin, the number would be higher, though how much higher is unclear. …
As a have previously written, I was treated for lymphoma with radiation therapy almost thirty-five years ago. A significant portion of my body received 40 sieverts. That is 2,000 times what I would get each airline trip. While that does not sound like much, I do have to wonder just what it will add on top of the damage that has already been done. But then the image of airliners flying into buildings is still very vivid. Such as hard trade off.
Where is high-speed rail? But then, the people that want to ruin our way of life would just bomb the trains. Guess I will just live with the risk of a little more radiation.
Is Still Here
David Agard, a biochemist and biophysicist at the University of California, San Francisco. “But there really is no threshold of low dose being 








It is scary. Science testing has fallen behind terrorist attacks. As usual, seems like the masses end up being at risk, regardless.