There is one recurring conversation I have had with scientists that clearly indicates the biggest source of job dissatisfaction for many PhDs working in industrial research positions. The conversation often occurs right after I have had to redirect an individual’s assignment to a different research effort because of changing business requirements. It generally does not occur if the new assignment is in a technical area that is very close to one that the individual had been working. It never occurs if the new assignment is in a technical area that is very close to one in which the individual completed their PhD. The issue arises for some when they are asked to move to a new technical area. We would not ask them to suddenly change from microbiology to astrophysics. But, it is common to ask a PhD in industry to branch into related areas.
The worst response I hear is, “I didn’t go to school for 9 years†to be flibbergibberist to do this…â€Â. Come on, you were not hired because you were a flibbergibberist! You were hired because you have a very solid general capability in a technical field that your employer needs, you have proven you can learn new things, and you have proven you can communicate (a least someone thought you could since your dissertation and defense got through a review). In other words, your ability to help on any new problem in a general technical area is your worth to your employer. They do not give a shit that you are a flibbergibberist. They want you to solve problems. If you do not solve problems you are worthless to them.
So here is the advice:
Find enjoyment in solving the problem
not in the problem you solve.
I know it sounds simple. But, unlike most early academic careers where you make your name by becoming an expert on one topic, in industry you make you name by being the person that can be counted on to help no matter what the problem. If you like to solve problems, you will find your industrial career not only rewarding but enjoyable too.
Is Still Here
I am assuming that you somehow managed to avoid partying too much (yes you Greeks out there, science undergrads party) and were able to actually schedule the right classes during the right terms and did not have to work too many jobs so you were able to finish undergraduate school in four years (a rare occurrence these days
). Further, I am assuming you were as lucky as I was and landed a full Research Fellowship for graduate school and that you were pushy enough (also like me) to force you advisor to let you finish in five years (it was not beyond me to suggest mildly-veiled threats, and besides, I had published most of the work already, so there!).









