When you are working in industry one issue you are likely to struggle with is having sufficient confidence in your efforts to take a position and communicate it when you have not fully completed your work. You will be faced with both technical and non-technical senior managers who will seek your input to help them assess the status of the project. Trust me, I know, since I am one of the people who always ask for this input. Qualifying your answers is acceptable, within limits, but you should always enter any discussion prepared to at least offer an assessment on the status or preliminary results of any effort in which you are participating.
I have seen many, many young scientists who were so afraid that they might not be exactly right that they never would offer input to a discussion. Unfortunately, I have seen what I suspect were some extremely capable people have their careers held back by this behavior.
On the other hand, I have also seen many young scientists who eagerly joined in and offered input into most discussions. Granted, there have been a small number who just open their mouths and spoke displaying precious few working brain cells between their ears†. However, the vast majority of those who did speak up went on to reasonable success in their chosen career. This was true even if they were not always right when they spoke up. What distinguished those individuals who were eventually successful from those who were not is actually quite simple. The successful individuals could be counted upon to correct any bad information they might have passed on. In fact, the most successful individuals would actively go back and confirm any information they had the slightest doubt about‡.
So, the lesson is:
Do not be paranoid
that what you say might be wrong,
be just a little paranoid
that what you did say was wrong.
Speak up. Participate in the conversation. But never forget, people will likely act upon what you say. Especially as you gain credibility. If people learn that they can count on you to pass on correct information or to correct information that you pass on that is incorrect, your career will prosper. Conversely, a reputation for passing on bad information is a sure path to career death.
♦ Is Still Here
†I suspect you can guess what became of their career in the job they were working in when they made the continual mindless comments.
‡ There is one particular scientist who has worked for me in the past who I would consider a moderately-skilled experimentalist. However, I would choose this individual as part of any team needing a dedicated laboratory person for one reason. This individual has continually proven that any data they produce can absolutely be trusted. It will either be taken as reported or this person will identify the error and report it.








